#13 Is Wikipedia a credible source for academic research?

開啟中
nancyharry1 年之前建立 · 0 條評論

Wikipedia is a good source of information but it should not be considered a credible source for academic research because it is open to any user, who can edit the entries. The information about any topic on the websites is Wikipedia Page Writing Company, if any user wants to change the entry, it does not require any verification. Another problem is that, the website is not updated on a regular basis, so it may not include information that is commonly used in the recent times. It is recommended to use Wikipedia as a good source of information but not a credible one. It has wide range of information on almost every subject with good credibility. No, because it is maintained by the general public and thus there is a large chance of it getting inaccurate information. It is still a good resource for any research.

Wikipedia is a good source of information but it should not be considered a credible source for academic research because it is open to any user, who can edit the entries. The information about any topic on the websites is [Wikipedia Page Writing Company](https://www.elitewikiwriting.com/), if any user wants to change the entry, it does not require any verification. Another problem is that, the website is not updated on a regular basis, so it may not include information that is commonly used in the recent times. It is recommended to use Wikipedia as a good source of information but not a credible one. It has wide range of information on almost every subject with good credibility. No, because it is maintained by the general public and thus there is a large chance of it getting inaccurate information. It is still a good resource for any research.
登入 才能加入這對話。
未選擇標籤
未選擇里程碑
No Assignees
1 參與者
Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

This issue currently doesn't have any dependencies.

Loading…
取消
儲存
尚未有任何內容